Thursday, February 28, 2008

n-word's worth

H. Lewis Smith, Founder/CEO of The United Voices for a Common Cause, Inc. (a non-profit organization raising funds for our educational campaign against self-destruction and debasement in various communities throughout the United States), contacted me in regards to Sharla's recent column in The Loyolan surrounding our n-word debate at LMU. He wanted me to run his article about the subject, before I informed him that we only run student pieces.

You can read his article
The Pulse Beat of Buffoonery, here.

My response to Lewis went as follows:


From the Lewis piece titled
The Pulse Beat of Buffoonery "The n-word is a mirror that reflects the transgressions of a once oppressive and malevolent society; a word that brought about death and destruction for a race of people's ancestors should not be spoken."

One's stance on the debate about the n-word remains to be dependent on exactly the bolded word above. For people who advocate for the death of the world (the end of use and discussion about it), they believe racism, oppression and malevolence are part of America's past. For people who believe these characteristics remain the make-up of contemporary American society, the debate about the word remains extremely important.

Nas' presence on the red-carpet to promote his new album "Nigger," was the tip of an ice berg-size investigation that he plans to conduct over the course of a Hip-Hop album, later this year.

Isolating this incident is worse that judging a book by its cover, its avoiding to read anything else about it.

Consequently, those who still think race is still a source of oppression must never close the book on the n-word.


peep the Nas-red carpet video here:




What do you think?

Saturday, February 23, 2008

The-N-Word by Dr. Cornel West

Listen to Dr. Cornel West and Dr. Michael Eric Dyson debate the current landscape of the N-Word. Be sure to read and comment on the Loyolan articles in Monday's Loyolan that speak to you the role of the word in College Fest. Both scholars are well versed in racially fueled arguments that are often aimed at Hip-Hop.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Devils Avocad-oh-eight


That's Right. The Devils Avacado Award* is back for a new year and hopefully with more frequency .

I have 24 issues left at the helm of the Opinion ship and I plan to steer it into cyberspace as much as possible, among many other things.

The beautifully informal blog-uh-sphere enables our ink and page crew to blast out to any and all internuckle heads.


With that being said, I would like to present the first DAA* to Alex Tandy, who recently established his columnist position as a staff writer for the Loyolan.

Mr. Tandy's piece "Some Laws Just Aren't Worth Having" does well to question somewhat peculiar law philosophies about protecting yourself. It tosses us into an ongoing discussion about whether we should be allowed to kill ourselves or not. People often ask if we should just let people who don't want protect themselves, allow them to do so.

After all, especially in a "free" country, one should be able to not wear a helmet or a seatbelt, if they don't want to. If an individual isn't putting anyone else in danger by doing so, of course. Indeed, the world and the USA has had it's share of laws prohibiting or punishing suicide, but it is a rather contradictory law for a nation like the "live free or die hard" USA to have.

Either way, there is something to be said about Tandy's questioning of seatbelt laws, in a moral sense. However, legalities of car accidents and the possibility of someone's body becoming a missile in a wreck do begin to dig up the reasons for seat belt law. Obviously its smart to wear a seatbelt if you want to protect your life, but the actual reasons for the law are in the best interests of other people, it seems. Which would fall into line with the Police motto of "protecting and serving," and believe me I'm not usually one to take the side of the one-time.

So, while this moral pondering is something worth pondering, drunk driving and speeding laws are certainly not. Tandy's storytelling and sharing on-the-rug approach to trying to compare the two laws is a little odd. I think everyone will concede to admit that speeding and DUI charges are warranted, but using them to fuel to attack a seat belt law makes the article not only unbalanced but unfortunate.

There would have been better ways to approach the seemingly absurd seat belt law, but I don't thing considering drunk driving is one of them.

What do you all think?

Also: if you are unfamiliar with the DAA* please check the posts on it below, it will give you an idea of its purpose and its somewhat anti-award nature.

Happy seat-belting.

Sunday, December 9, 2007

Too Juicy: Threats, Arrests and Traceability in Web 2.0 world

I'm sure you are all up on the Shooting threat made prior to finals week by an LMU student on Juicycampus. With finals week, the devil on my shoulder, I wanted to point everyone to a post by a former co-worker of mine Kelly Sutton and his take on the situation. It pretty much says what I want to.

On a lighter note, Kelly's site hackcollege.com always has helpful college related tips and good insight on all things schooly. Check up on it.

Good luck with finals and look for this blog to liven up in 2008.

Much Love

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Obituary for George W. Bush

DADDY’S BOY…THE ACCIDENTAL PRESIDENT…SELLING LIES AND FEAR TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC….SCANDAL! SCANDAL! SCANDAL!...WHO IS STEERING THIS SHIP?...THE DEATH OF THE GREAT EMPIRE!

President Bush is perhaps the most religious man to ever lead the free world. He believes in the rapture where the pure and righteous are sucked up by God to sit at His right hand, leaving the selfish and wicked to battle Satan’s armies on doomsday. As a degenerate liberal, there is no room for me in the seven firmaments of heaven. Since Bush will live on in eternity, I will never have the privilege of writing my dream assignment- his obituary. So, in the spirit of Hunter S. Thompson’s obituary for Richard Nixon, I decided to write President Bush’s preemptively. I hope Mr. Bush doesn’t mind, he never seemed to have a problem with preemption anyway…

Crawford, Texas. President Bush is dead and the country is better for it. Bush ironically died at his ranch in Texas, the place where he dug his own nation’s grave by spending a record setting number of vacation days away from the political horrors looming back in Washington. He was an incompetent leader, a liar and an arrogant fool who jeopardized the security of this country and sacrificed our good standing with the international community. He was the ugly American who peed in the streets, upset the locals and got a little too loud and obnoxious when he was drinking. He turned the White House into a Corporate HQ and the country will never be the same.

Bush was the very antithesis of the American Dream. He was the type of man who would trip you as the bear approaches before taking off in the opposite direction, then stand at a podium and praise your heroic self-sacrifice. Horatio Alger would have reeled back in disgust at Bush’s devious rise to the top, which was actually a short and smooth road to haul for Mr. Bush. He was the son of a king and he took some easy steps over a few dead bodies to get to the summit. Those carcasses were, among other things, our nation’s sacred history of having our Throne be voted for, not inherited, the Texas Rangers, and the credibility of the Supreme Court after its Justices served Bush the presidency on a silver platter. Who knows how many toes Bush stepped on with his diamond-crusted bootstraps?

On the day of Bush’s inauguration, the parade up Pennsylvania Avenue towards the Capitol looked more like a scene out of the battle zone the President was about to create in Baghdad. Thousands of protesters, representing the majority of the country who did not vote for Bush, threw eggs and cursed at the presidential limousine as it sped by. One man held up a large sign that read “Lord Help Us.” Machiavelli himself could not have written a truer protest sign.

The nation collectively inhaled as Bush took the oath at his inauguration on the steps of the Capital. He solemnly swore, “I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Lies! Perjury! Bush only upheld the first part of his oath by acting as the executioner of the office of the President. He must have crossed his bloody fingers behind his back during the second promise. No President in the history of this country has been more disastrous to the sanctity of our constitution. Warrentless wiretaps, the death of habeas corpus for the “enemy combatants” at Guantanamo, the redefining of torture under the Geneva Conventions, tracking of financial records, and the outing of Valerie Plame are just some of the terrors that Bush leaves in his disastrous wake.

When the Twin Towers were hit, the nation got a chance to see how this man responds in a crisis. Andy Card whispered into his ear that “the country is under attack,” and the President sucked his thumb like a coward for seven minutes before taking action. It seemed that the Presidency had just become all too real for Baby Bush, who looked like a deer caught in the headlights in his nation’s time of need. It was the height of incompetence. In an age of nuclear war, the man in charge of The Button cannot afford to hesitate for seven seconds, much less seven minutes, before acting on a threat. It would have been a more rational reaction to start flailing around in front of those first graders, wild-eyed and screaming doomsday prophesies while shoving the little buggers under their desks. He should have been impeached for that display of hesitation alone.

Then came he Fear. Carefully calculated and manufactured lies about weapons of mass destruction, mushroom clouds, anthrax, mobile weapons labs, duct tape, terror alerts, and other meaningless threats to paralyze the American people into a state of Catatonic Terror. As the Fear dragged on, Americans began to wonder who the real terrorist in that grim equation was. But…we couldn’t question him, what if he was right? What if the smoking gun would be in the form of a mushroom cloud?

Yes sir! We were going to war all right. It was just a matter of which Arab was going to be the fall guy. Somebody had to die for our sins. Someone had to pay! There were intolerable vibrations in this country, and our blood-thirst had to be quenched before things got really nasty.

It was oil and vengeance that sealed the fate for Iraq. It was the ultimate revenge fantasy. The son avenges his father’s honor and emerges vindicated, drenched in crude petroleum, with the saga broadcasted into the homes of the American public 24/7 by some of the most ruthless folks in the media.

More problems followed.

As the Administration stumbled forward, we started to witness the terrible upshot of Bush’s intellectual insecurity. In crippling bouts of paranoia, President Bush decided to surround himself with people dumber than he was. It was a dangerous kind of lunacy, like taking shots with your cabbie.

In scandal after scandal, the incompetence of the Bush appointees came to light. Leaks, missing email records, resignations, vicious partisan bickering, and questionable firings of US attorneys all showed how far the country had sunk. We then started to realize that this much damage cannot be accomplished by one man, Bush was just the blind minion. It was Cheney that was the evil wizard pulling the levers behind the curtain.

Ahhh…madness and senseless finger pointing. I knew I would get into some heavy hyperbole in this obituary. But my hatred for Bush does not clear him of any accountability or erase his dreadful stamp on some of the worst examples of leadership in American history. He was the key player in the death of this Great Empire. Now the country that once was…ruined by corporate greed and policy decisions stemming from a lethal combination of ignorance and arrogance.
Somewhere buried in the ruins of the World Trade Center Towers, is a once free and proud nation. Forsaken by the puppet that was steering it, Bush will go down in history as the bumbling captain of the sinking ship, denying that the boat was taking on any water until we were up to our necks. To his death he stayed true to his defining characteristic of being stubborn in his beliefs when facts suggested he should think otherwise. Bush tirelessly looked forward with great optimism…I think we are all doomed.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Devil's Avocado for Nov. 8 Issue - Green lightin' wannabes


I know what your thinking, the imaginary thousands of you who read this blog, where did the DAA* (Devil's Avocado Award*) go after the first recipient almost a month ago? We'll, my bag of Avos went rancid in the fridge when I trekked to DC & lost my ATM card. No cash meant no avocados meaning no award.

The good news, is, that through various donations from Loyolan Op Blog lovers, we were able to scramble enough money to buy more Avos. So essentially — the award is back.

For the latest issue, the award goes to... drum roll...drum roll....STOP!

Madeline Lau for her "Activism: It's such a trend" article.

Ms. Lau, our most commented on writer since the inception of the Loyolan comments feature on the website, made some good points about the mass, abrupt, over-haul of tree/leopard/ farmer/sand bar huggers that exist today.

Envirotrends, are indeed 'in' and Ms. Lau's Oregon roots allow her to see the abundance extra explicitly. She does well to show the over-the-top nature of eco-friendly culture and, at the same time, it's inability to create real change.

Here, however, I must play the devil's avocado.

-
Anyone can see that these trends are prevalent in 07 but does what is Ms. Lau really asking by exposing them? Are the evo-trenders supposed to be more genuine? Are they supposed to already be concerned about the environment without "eco-friendly culture" bombarding them?

-The fact of the matter is, trendy or not, Eco friendly behavior/awareness will have the greater chance of making a difference in the global warming scheme of things than unfriendly eco-ness.

-I heard about the "One" campaign to end poverty through a friend's rubber bracelet. I joined the mailing lists and I sign the petitions. It might not make a world of difference, but it's better than nothing. If it wasn't for those trendy bracelets, I may have never known. If it wasn't for the campaigns celebrity endorsements, many others also wouldn't have known.

I guess the question is this: Are these 'trendy' environmentalists actually helping or hurting the effort to save our planet?

Sink your teeth into it...

Congrats Madeline for being receiving the second DAA*, it's fresh!

Entering the Blogosphere

A surge of nostalgia coursed through the mainline of my conscious thinking as I drove down 80th street. I remember driving onto the LMU campus for the first time via this route. The first time I ventured down 80th street into the realm of decadence that is LMU, I felt humbled by this institution of higher knowledge. This time, as I headed away from the wedding-white ethos of Los Angeles' Jesuit playground, I felt calloused and hyper-aware. During this most recent fall break, I reversed the polarity of that first trip down 80th—taking my mind and body out of the Jesuit oasis and dragging them across the desert to a sin pit known as Las Vegas.

People all over the world are captivated by Las Vegas. The allure of this maniacal locket, swaying casually around the neck of Uncle Sam—enticing our senses with every color in the known spectrum—is indeed strong. The days when the mob ruled Vegas with an iron fist are over—at least on the surface. Vegas' strip has become a schizophrenic Disneyland. It is a place where parents take their children to get them used to swimming with the sharks. As for myself, I had never been there in my life until this trip. But I grew up in a culture that idolized the Vegas family vacation: Dad throwing craps, Kids playing first-person shooters in the arcade, and Mom getting that long deserved massage from some young dude who induces delusions of pool-guy-fantasy grandeur. But these people are simply filler—bodies to make the place look appealing and popular. They provide the perfect camouflage for the degenerates and culture junkies.


This is not supposed to be another obscure account of a word weirdo’s trip to the city of Las Vegas. But it was during this trip to Vegas that my private musings about this country bubbled over. I was totally transfixed during my short stint on the strip by what was happening around me. I watched my fellow citizens throw money to the desert wind, only to return home to California where massive fires were consuming the safety of hilltop suburbia.


I suppose what I am getting at is that I am terribly confused by the condition and the identity of an American living in the post-modern age. Here we are in our cocoon, throwing money at sketchy Vegas dealers, dreading 10-year-olds armed with matches, and all the while a holy war is taking place on the other side of the world.


Hopefully this is a sufficient hop onto the blog bandwagon. Above is the first appetizer to be served in an ostensibly multi-coursed meal.

Monday, October 15, 2007

Oct. 1 Board Ed upsets California Catholic Daily

Nearly two weeks after our Board Ed titled "Education above Dogma" printed, justifying Fr. Lawton's (as well as LMU as a whole) ability to reach out for the betterment of the education of the students, this article was printed in California Catholic Daily.

Give the article a read and take a look at the comments/their authors

I won't lead you too much, form your own opinions and comment here or there.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Oct. 11 Issue's Devil's Avocado: Sprayin' Em Down


The first Devil's Avocado Award* goes to Tyler Rigger's article "No Spray, no thank you"

Tyler's first submission went well (besides his snowboarding head shot). He introduces an interesting anti-organic perspective to our overly organicized shopping tendencies. I think whether we want to believe it or not, Organic tags catch our eyes and make us feel better about our purchases regardless of taste. I commend Tyler's commitment to assume an unpopular stance about groceries (not for the first time this year, see this smoking gun piece which is in the same vein). Tyler's pondering lead us to wonder about how natural resources and more specifically crops, are being under-utilized by organic farming. He asserts that we can actually produce more food with less land if we use pesticides and other scientific "technologically cutting edge" farming techniques.

Here I have to play Devil's Avocado...

While we may be more efficient farmers if we use pesticides, overall health could (and does) suffer from pesticide use. If the effects of the nightmare pesticide DDT are still under your radar, check this article in Science Daily linking the chemical to breast cancer that was published two days ago. Just because we could make more tomatoes, doesn't mean those tomatoes are still as good for us (in fact they might end up killing us).

So couldn't the question really be, would we rather have less starving people but more famished or diseased people?

Are we willing to trade "world hunger" for "world cancer"?

Roll this one around next time you're pushing your filling your grocery carts.

Good article Tyler. Congratulations on being the first recipient of the Devil's Avocado Award*

I hope you don't mind that it was organically grown.

Loy-Op & The Devil's Avocado Award*






+






First, what is the Devil's Avocado Award*?

Well, for starters, its an award with an asterisk after it. Every issue that comes out (or most), I'm going to try to pick a story of particular strength to the section.

For the sake of argument, I'm also going to play Devil's Avocado, or basically, be the sweet refuter of the writers argument, that also goes well with Sushi and almost defines California crafty/savvyness in physical form.

The purpose of this is not only to always have the last word in my section (that's right), but also to continue on going discussion about issues that my writers bring up. I want to show that there is endlessly, another side(s) to the argument(s) and to make students wary of rhetoric in this/all media, even if it is operating in my own section (or through my own words).

So, I hope everyone enjoys, embraces and craves the Devil's Avocado Award* as it appears exclusively at the Loyolan Opinion Blog.

-Writers, remember, you're winning an award (with an Asterisk). Would you rather not get an award or be the Barry Bonds of the week? That's what I thought.

Monday, October 8, 2007

So just what is it about those students in the back?

Hey everyone, this is your favorite cartoonist speaking. So, while I am definitely not a writer on par with some of the Loyolan staff, I do like to get my opinions out every now and then. My editors and myself thought that me posting on this blog would prove to be somewhat interesting to the rest of you.

First, a bit about myself. I am a senior animation major (yes, we exist) at LMU and aside from slaving away at toons for my thesis and the Loyolan, I am also an active member in Laser Squad Bravo. Speaking of my thesis, I have another blog that I'll be updating throughout the year that will serve as a production diary to my thesis. I urge all of you to go check it out!

Now, onto Loyolan stuff. Today I only had one picture in the Loyolan so this'll be pretty short. The article itself was about the kids who sit quietly in the back of the classroom. The author basically argues that she (a self proclaimed quiet student) is just as sociable as the other students in class.

Bullshit. Now, I understand that some people do need a little push to get going, but what this article says to me is "I am not going to attempt to talk to you, but you should talk to me. If I come off as quiet and standoffish, then its partly your fault."

Now I know that I'm coming off harsh right now. I have no personal malice on the author. The article is well written, I just happen to disagree with it a bit.

That's the trouble with being a cartoonist for the Opinion section. I do not always agree with the stances of the articles I'm assigned, and sometimes when I do agree with the final opinion, I do not support the argument. Take the "Greek Weak" pro/con feature that we had a few weeks back. I am Greek myself, so I obviously lean more toward the pro side. But the "pro" Greek side was a terribly written opinion piece. I'd hate to be harsh like that, but it really did nothing but reinforce why some people hate the Greek community. And while James' "con" piece brought nothing new I really don't think it needed to. The Pro side had a greater responsibility to uphold and it did not get that creative in it's argument (ABC's GREEK? Really? REALLY?).

So in the end for both articles, this week's and "Greek Weak", my cartoon questions the entire topic a bit. The toon this week shows a bunch of students all speaking their minds from varying classes and then we have the quiet student. Now, most comments said in class tend to be completely un-thought (is that even a word?) provoking anyway. There are some people that you just wish would stop raising their hand because they are wasting our time as students. So perhaps it really is OK to be a quiet student.

I think I just defeated my own argument. You will have to excuse me, being an animation major I average about 3 hours of sleep a night. Hopefully my next entry will be a bit more coherent.

Friday, October 5, 2007

Video RE: "Don't tase me, bro"

In the Sept. 24 edition, I wrote an article referring to a tasing incident at the university of Florida. Peep the vid below and read the article following.



"Don't tase me, bro"
by Alex Dwyer

I'm a proud fence hopper. The shortest distance between two points is a straight line. My crib borders the school-I'm not walking around. For me that means fence hurdling.

Thankfully, I think that my sneak entrance is in a rare nook on campus where there isn't a camera. Still, I've spotted my share of lurking P-safe guardians protecting LMU's border. The other day, I was off my game. I was tired and I approached the leaping point aloof. Luckily, half way across I noticed a P-safe officer.

"Hey," he called, rapidly approaching, "wait right there!" Of course I didn't stay. I squirmed back to free land before the officer could tase me into a coma.

Read the rest here.

The birth of Loy-Op-Bloggin'

Welcome to The Loyolan's Opinion Blog. This is the place for Opinion section related tangents, thoughts, comments, continuations, etc. that didn't make it into the regular inked pages of Loyola Marymount's newspaper.

The opinion section is poised to become something that can take the entire Loyolan to another level. It is THE place to speak out for our entire campus and I want it to be as broad and strongly written as humanly possible. I'm looking for serious, funny, ironic, down to earth, college student, young adult, nostalgic, academic, poetic, breakthrough, avant-garde, articles and I know you can all deliver on a number of those fronts.

With 5,000 print copies distributed every issue and around 1,500 online views, you're writing will reach a few thousand readers. I want my writers to dig deeper, allowing for solutions, government sanction stances, personal narratives, etc. to enhance the columns readability as well as its ability to spark dialogue around campus. Controversial articles WILL be printed as long as the argument is sound and the free speech doesn't become hate speech. All voices should be heard and I am going to try my best to have them all heard—so long as they are well written!

Aside from Editors posts, we hope to incorporate contributors and staff writers to share their everything blog worthy. In addition to text, we will have videos, photos and other multimedia.

Utilizing the Web 2.0 can take the Loyolan Opinions beyond the pages, literally.

Happy blogging.